Duck-typing, scope, and investigative functions in Python

Last Updated on February 16, 2022

Python is a duck typing language. It means the data types of variables can change as long as the syntax is compatible. Python is also a dynamic programming language. Meaning we can change the program while it runs, including defining new functions and the scope of name resolution. Not only these give us a new paradigm in writing Python code, but also a new set of tools for debugging. In the following, we will see what we can do in Python that cannot be done in many other languages. After finishing this tutorial you will know

How Python manages the variables you defined
How Python code uses a variable and why we don’t need to define its type like C or Java

Let’s get started.

Overview

This tutorial is in three parts, they are

Duck typing in programming languages
Scopes and name space in Python
Investigating the type and scope

Duck typing in programming languages

Duck typing is a feature of some modern programming languages that allow data types to be dynamic.

A programming style which does not look at an object’s type to determine if it has the right interface; instead, the method or attribute is simply called or used (“If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.”) By emphasizing interfaces rather than specific types, well-designed code improves its flexibility by allowing polymorphic substitution.

— Python Glossary

Simply speaking, the program should allow you to swap data structures as long as the same syntax still makes sense. In C, for example, you have to define functions like the following

float fsquare(float x)
{
return x * x;
};

int isquare(int x)
{
return x * x;
};

while the operation x * x is identical for integers and floating point numbers, a function taking an integer argument and a function taking a floating point argument are not the same. Because types are static in C, we must define two functions although they are performing the same logic. In Python, types are dynamic, hence we can define the corresponding function as

def square(x):
return x * x

This feature indeed gives us tremendous power and convenience. For example, from scikit-learn, we have a function to do cross validation

# evaluate a perceptron model on the dataset
from numpy import mean
from numpy import std
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.model_selection import RepeatedStratifiedKFold
from sklearn.linear_model import Perceptron
# define dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=10, n_informative=10, n_redundant=0, random_state=1)
# define model
model = Perceptron()
# define model evaluation method
cv = RepeatedStratifiedKFold(n_splits=10, n_repeats=3, random_state=1)
# evaluate model
scores = cross_val_score(model, X, y, scoring=’accuracy’, cv=cv, n_jobs=-1)
# summarize result
print(‘Mean Accuracy: %.3f (%.3f)’ % (mean(scores), std(scores)))

But in the above, the model is a variable of a scikit-learn model object. It doesn’t matter if it is a perceptron model as in the above, or a decision tree, or a support vector machine model. What matters is that, inside cross_val_score() function the data will be passed onto the model with its fit() function. Therefore the model must implement the fit() member function and the fit() function behaves identically. The consequence is that, cross_val_score() function is not expecting any particular model type as long as it looks like one. If we are using Keras to build a neural network model, we can make the Keras model looks like a scikit-learn model with a wrapper:

# MLP for Pima Indians Dataset with 10-fold cross validation via sklearn
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.wrappers.scikit_learn import KerasClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.datasets import load_diabetes
import numpy

# Function to create model, required for KerasClassifier
def create_model():
# create model
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(12, input_dim=8, activation=’relu’))
model.add(Dense(8, activation=’relu’))
model.add(Dense(1, activation=’sigmoid’))
# Compile model
model.compile(loss=’binary_crossentropy’, optimizer=’adam’, metrics=[‘accuracy’])
return model

# fix random seed for reproducibility
seed = 7
numpy.random.seed(seed)
# load pima indians dataset
dataset = numpy.loadtxt(“https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/pima-indians-diabetes.csv”, delimiter=”,”)
# split into input (X) and output (Y) variables
X = dataset[:,0:8]
Y = dataset[:,8]
# create model
model = KerasClassifier(build_fn=create_model, epochs=150, batch_size=10, verbose=0)
# evaluate using 10-fold cross validation
kfold = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=10, shuffle=True, random_state=seed)
results = cross_val_score(model, X, Y, cv=kfold)
print(results.mean())

In the above, we used the wrapper from Tensorflow. Other wrappers exist, such as scikeras. All it does is to make sure the interface of Keras model looks like a scikit-learn classifier so you can make use of the cross_val_score() function. If we replace the model above with

<span class=”cm-variable”>model</span> <span class=”cm-operator”>=</span> <span class=”cm-variable”>create_model</span>()

then the scikit-learn function will complain as it cannot find the model.score() function.

Similarly, because of duck typing, we can reuse a function that expects a list for NumPy array or pandas series because they all supports the same indexing and slicing operation. For example, the fitting a time series with ARIMA as follows:

from statsmodels.tsa.statespace.sarimax import SARIMAX
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

data = [266.0,145.9,183.1,119.3,180.3,168.5,231.8,224.5,192.8,122.9,336.5,185.9,
194.3,149.5,210.1,273.3,191.4,287.0,226.0,303.6,289.9,421.6,264.5,342.3,
339.7,440.4,315.9,439.3,401.3,437.4,575.5,407.6,682.0,475.3,581.3,646.9]
model = SARIMAX(y, order=(5,1,0))
res = model.fit(disp=False)
print(“AIC = “, res.aic)

data = np.array(data)
model = SARIMAX(y, order=(5,1,0))
res = model.fit(disp=False)
print(“AIC = “, res.aic)

data = pd.Series(data)
model = SARIMAX(y, order=(5,1,0))
res = model.fit(disp=False)
print(“AIC = “, res.aic)

The above should produce the same AIC scores for each fitting.

Scopes and name space in Python

In most languages, variables are defined in a limited scope. For example, a variable defined inside a function is accessible only inside that function:

from math import sqrt

def quadratic(a,b,c):
discrim = b*b – 4*a*c
x = -b/(2*a)
y = sqrt(discrim)/(2*a)
return x-y, x+y

the local variable discrim is no way to be accessible if we are not inside the function quadratic(). Moreover, this may be surprising for someone:

a = 1

def f(x):
a = 2 * x
return a

b = f(3)
print(a, b)

1 6

We defined the variable a outside function f but inside f, variable a is assigned to be 2 * x. However, the a inside function and the one outside are unrelated except the name. Therefore, as we exit from the function, the value of a is untouched. To make it modifiable inside function f, we need to declare the name a as global so to make it clear that this name should be from the global scope not the local scope:

a = 1

def f(x):
global a
a = 2 * x
return a

b = f(3)
print(a, b)

6 6

However, we may further complicated the issue when we introduced the nested scope in functions. Consider the following example:

a = 1

def f(x):
a = x
def g(x):
return a * x
return g(3)

b = f(2)
print(b)

6

The variable a inside function f is distinct from the global one. However, when inside g, since there is never anything written to a but merely read from it, Python will see the same a from the nearest scope, i.e., from function f. The variable x however, is defined as argument to the function g and it takes the value 3 when we called g(3) instead of assuming the value of x from function f.

NOTE: If a variable has any value assigned to it anywhere in the function, it is defined in the local scope. And if that variable has its value read from it before the assignment, an error is raised rather than using the value from the variable of the same name from the outer or global scope.

This property has many uses. Many implementations of memoization decorators in Python make clever use of the function scopes. Another example is the following:

import numpy as np

def datagen(X, y, batch_size, sampling_rate=0.7):
“””A generator to produce samples from input numpy arrays X and y
“””
# Select rows from arrays X and y randomly
indexing = np.random.random(len(X)) < sampling_rate
Xsam, ysam = X[indexing], y[indexing]

# Actual logic to generate batches
def _gen(batch_size):
while True:
Xbatch, ybatch = [], []
for _ in range(batch_size):
i = np.random.randint(len(Xsam))
Xbatch.append(Xsam[i])
ybatch.append(ysam[i])
yield np.array(Xbatch), np.array(ybatch)

# Create and return a generator
return _gen(batch_size)

This is a generator function that creates batches of samples from the input numpy arrays X and y. Such generator is acceptable by Keras models in their training. However, for reasons such as cross validation, we do not want to sample from the entire input arrays X and y but a fixed subset of rows from them. The way we do it is to randomly select a portion of rows at the beginning of the datagen() function and keep them in Xsam, ysam. Then in the inner function _gen(), rows are sampled from Xsam and ysam until a batch is created. While the lists Xbatch and ybatch are defined and created inside function _gen(), the arrays Xsam and ysam are not local to _gen(). What’s more interesting is when the generator is created:

X = np.random.random((100,3))
y = np.random.random(100)

gen1 = datagen(X, y, 3)
gen2 = datagen(X, y, 4)
print(next(gen1))
print(next(gen2))

(array([[0.89702235, 0.97516228, 0.08893787],
[0.26395301, 0.37674529, 0.1439478 ],
[0.24859104, 0.17448628, 0.41182877]]), array([0.2821138 , 0.87590954, 0.96646776]))
(array([[0.62199772, 0.01442743, 0.4897467 ],
[0.41129379, 0.24600387, 0.53640666],
[0.02417213, 0.27637708, 0.65571031],
[0.15107433, 0.11331674, 0.67000849]]), array([0.91559533, 0.84886957, 0.30451455, 0.5144225 ]))

The function datagen() is called two times and therefore two different sets of Xsam, ysam are created. But since the inner function _gen() depends on them, these two sets of Xsam, ysam are in memory concurrently. Technically, we say that when datagen() is called, a closure is created with the specific Xsam, ysam defined within, and the call to _gen() is accessing that closure. In other words, the scopes of the two incarnation of datagen() calls coexists.

In summary, whenever a line of code references to a name (whether it is a variable, a function, or a module), the name is resolved in the order of LEGB rule:

Local scope first, i.e., those name that defined in the same function
Enclosure, or called the “nonlocal” scope. That’s the upper level function if we are inside the nested function
Global scope, i.e., those that defined in the top level of the same script (but not across different program files)
Built-in scope, i.e., those created by Python automatically, such as the variable __name__ or functions list()

Investigating the type and scope

Because the types are not static in Python, sometimes we would like to know what we are dealing with but it is not trivial to tell from the code. One way to tell is using the type() or isinstance() functions. For example:

import numpy as np

X = np.random.random((100,3))
print(type(X))
print(isinstance(X, np.ndarray))

<class ‘numpy.ndarray’>
True

The type() function returns a type object. The isinstance() function returns a boolean that allows us to check if something matches a particular type. These are useful in case we need to know what type a variable is. This is useful if we are debugging a code. For example, if we pass on a pandas dataframe to the datagen() function that we defined above:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

def datagen(X, y, batch_size, sampling_rate=0.7):
“””A generator to produce samples from input numpy arrays X and y
“””
# Select rows from arrays X and y randomly
indexing = np.random.random(len(X)) < sampling_rate
Xsam, ysam = X[indexing], y[indexing]

# Actual logic to generate batches
def _gen(batch_size):
while True:
Xbatch, ybatch = [], []
for _ in range(batch_size):
i = np.random.randint(len(Xsam))
Xbatch.append(Xsam[i])
ybatch.append(ysam[i])
yield np.array(Xbatch), np.array(ybatch)

# Create and return a generator
return _gen(batch_size)

X = pd.DataFrame(np.random.random((100,3)))
y = pd.DataFrame(np.random.random(100))

gen3 = datagen(X, y, 3)
print(next(gen3))

Running the above code under the Python’s debugger pdb will give the following:

> /Users/MLM/ducktype.py(1)<module>()
-> import pandas as pd
(Pdb) c
Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/core/indexes/range.py”, line 385, in get_loc
return self._range.index(new_key)
ValueError: 1 is not in range

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/usr/local/Cellar/[email protected]/3.9.9/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/pdb.py”, line 1723, in main
pdb._runscript(mainpyfile)
File “/usr/local/Cellar/[email protected]/3.9.9/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/pdb.py”, line 1583, in _runscript
self.run(statement)
File “/usr/local/Cellar/[email protected]/3.9.9/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/bdb.py”, line 580, in run
exec(cmd, globals, locals)
File “<string>”, line 1, in <module>
File “/Users/MLM/ducktype.py”, line 1, in <module>
import pandas as pd
File “/Users/MLM/ducktype.py”, line 18, in _gen
ybatch.append(ysam[i])
File “/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py”, line 3458, in __getitem__
indexer = self.columns.get_loc(key)
File “/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/core/indexes/range.py”, line 387, in get_loc
raise KeyError(key) from err
KeyError: 1
Uncaught exception. Entering post mortem debugging
Running ‘cont’ or ‘step’ will restart the program
> /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/core/indexes/range.py(387)get_loc()
-> raise KeyError(key) from err
(Pdb)

We see from the traceback that something is wrong because we cannot get ysam[i]. We can use the following to verify that ysam is indeed a Pandas DataFrame instead of a NumPy array:

(Pdb) up
> /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py(3458)__getitem__()
-> indexer = self.columns.get_loc(key)
(Pdb) up
> /Users/MLM/ducktype.py(18)_gen()
-> ybatch.append(ysam[i])
(Pdb) type(ysam)
<class ‘pandas.core.frame.DataFrame’>

Therefore we cannot use ysam[i] to select row i from ysam. Now in the debugger, what can we do to verify how should we modify our code? There are several useful functions you can use to investigate the variables and the scope:

dir() to see the names defined in the scope or the attributes defined in an object
locals() and globals() to see the names and values defined locally and globally, respectively.

For example, we can use dir(ysam) to see what attributes or functions are defined inside ysam:

(Pdb) dir(ysam)
[‘T’, ‘_AXIS_LEN’, ‘_AXIS_ORDERS’, ‘_AXIS_REVERSED’, ‘_AXIS_TO_AXIS_NUMBER’,
…
‘iat’, ‘idxmax’, ‘idxmin’, ‘iloc’, ‘index’, ‘infer_objects’, ‘info’, ‘insert’,
‘interpolate’, ‘isin’, ‘isna’, ‘isnull’, ‘items’, ‘iteritems’, ‘iterrows’,
‘itertuples’, ‘join’, ‘keys’, ‘kurt’, ‘kurtosis’, ‘last’, ‘last_valid_index’,
…
‘transform’, ‘transpose’, ‘truediv’, ‘truncate’, ‘tz_convert’, ‘tz_localize’,
‘unstack’, ‘update’, ‘value_counts’, ‘values’, ‘var’, ‘where’, ‘xs’]
(Pdb)

Some of these are attributes, such as shape, and some of these are functions, such as describe(). You can read the attribute or invoke the function in pdb. By carefully reading this output, we recalled that the way to read row i from a DataFrame is through iloc and hence we can verify the syntax with:

(Pdb) ysam.iloc[i]
0 0.83794
Name: 2, dtype: float64
(Pdb)

If we call dir() without any argument, it gives you all the names defined in the current scope, e.g.,

(Pdb) dir()
[‘Xbatch’, ‘Xsam’, ‘_’, ‘batch_size’, ‘i’, ‘ybatch’, ‘ysam’]
(Pdb) up
> /Users/MLM/ducktype.py(1)<module>()
-> import pandas as pd
(Pdb) dir()
[‘X’, ‘__builtins__’, ‘__file__’, ‘__name__’, ‘datagen’, ‘gen3’, ‘np’, ‘pd’, ‘y’]
(Pdb)

which the scope changes as you move around the call stack. Similar to dir() without argument, we can call locals() to show all locally defined variables, e.g.,

(Pdb) locals()
{‘batch_size’: 3, ‘Xbatch’: …,
‘ybatch’: …, ‘_’: 0, ‘i’: 1, ‘Xsam’: …,
‘ysam’: …}
(Pdb)

Indeed locals() returns you a dict that allows you to see all the names and values. Therefore if we need to read the variable Xbatch, we can get the same with locals()[“Xbatch”]. Similarly, we can use globals() to get a dictionary of names defined in the global scope.

This technique is beneficial sometimes. For example, we can check if a Keras model is “compiled” or not by using dir(model). In Keras, compiling a model is to set up the loss function for training and build the flow for forward and backward propagations. Therefore, a compiled model will have an extra attribute loss defined:

from tensorflow.keras import Sequential
from tensorflow.keras.layers import Dense

model = Sequential([
Dense(5, input_shape=(3,)),
Dense(1)
])

has_loss = “loss” in dir(model)
print(“Before compile, loss function defined:”, has_loss)

model.compile()
has_loss = “loss” in dir(model)
print(“After compile, loss function defined:”, has_loss)

Before compile, loss function defined: False
After compile, loss function defined: True

This allows us to put extra guard on our code before we run into error.

Further reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

Articles

Duck typing, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing
Python Glossary (Duck-typing), https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-duck-typing
Python built-in functions, https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html

Books

Fluent Python, second edition, by Luciano Ramalho, https://www.amazon.com/dp/1492056359/

Summary

In this tutorial, you’ve see how Python organize the naming scopes and how variables are interacting with the code. Specifically, you learned

Python code uses variables through their interfaces, therefore variables’ data type is usually unimportant
Python variables are defined in their naming scope or closure, which variables of the same name can coexist in different scopes so they are not interfering each other
We have some built-in functions from Python to allow us to examine the names defined in the current scope or the data type of a variable

The post Duck-typing, scope, and investigative functions in Python appeared first on Machine Learning Mastery.

Read MoreMachine Learning Mastery